Join FREE now and by no means miss the highest politics tales once more.
We are going to use your e-mail tackle just for sending you newsletters. Please see our Privacy Notice for particulars of your information safety rights.
The brand new and improved look will imply the plane can “higher characterize the UK all over the world with nationwide branding,” the Prime Minister’s spokesman mentioned. The airplane, which is utilized by the Royal Household, is in Cambridgeshire for the paint job. Mr Johnson’s choice to provide the RAF Voyager a lick of paint has been met with fierce opposition from MPs and members of the general public.
Lib Dem MP Jamie Stone branded it an “absurd waste” of money.
He mentioned the cash may have been channelled in the direction of the Britons who’ve run into monetary problem throughout the pandemic.
Mr Stone mentioned: “This absurd waste of almost £1 million at a time when so many are struggling to place meals on the desk is insulting.
“We face the largest disaster in generations however Boris is worried with the colors of his airplane.
Do you assume Boris Johnson’s choice to spend £900okay of taxpayers’ money on the paint job is a waste? (Picture: GETTY)
The PM has come below hearth over the paint job (Picture: GETTY)
“Can he pay for this, reasonably than invoice the taxpayer?”
Deputy chief of Welsh Labour Carolyn Harris mentioned: “£900,000 to place a flag on the Prime Minister’s airplane.
“That might pay for 60,000 free college meal vouchers.”
And Sir Ed Davey, appearing chief of the Liberal Democrats mentioned: “The drug dexamethasone, that may probably save the lives of individuals with coronavirus, prices £5 per affected person.
“Boris Johnson may have purchased 180,000 doses of that, however as a substitute he is portray a flag on a airplane.”
However others backed his choice to splurge on the paint job.
One social media consumer mentioned: “Sure, as we now look to commerce with the world in an unrestricted EU-free method, Model Britain is extra essential than ever.”
A second individual mentioned they discovered it to be an excellent transfer when it comes to advertising and marketing model Britain.
The airplane will probably be painted within the Union Jack colors (Picture: GETTY)
They tweeted: “Completely… it is advertising and marketing.
“Each enterprise has a price range for that and we at the moment are open to the world for enterprise.”
They mentioned £900,000 is “lots much less” than the large sums the EU spends transport for MEPs.
The Royal Household additionally use the airplane (Picture: GETTY)
Talking to Sky Information’ Kay Burley in regards to the mission on Wednesday morning, International Secretary Dominic Raab defended his boss’ choice.
Mr Raab mentioned: “We do ensure we preserve and improve the issues just like the plane and different issues that assist us mission our affect overseas in a traditional approach.
“Clearly, we need to ensure we get good worth for cash with all these initiatives however it’s actually essential that we’re on the market on this planet projecting world affect significantly at a time with coronavirus when our worldwide cooperation is extra essential than ever.”
The RAF Voyager (Picture: GETTY)
When it was put to him that the cash might be “higher spent elsewhere” he refuted the declare.
Mr Raab mentioned: “Look, we’re very cautious with these selections, they’re correctly scrutinised.
“However as I mentioned, don’t underestimate the position of the UK on this planet for delivering worth for cash for taxpayers at residence and sure having plane that may ensure the Prime Minister can get from place to position as swiftly as attainable is a part of that. “